A fortnight ago our national netball team won all
six-matches in a tournament in Botswana, to qualify for the sports’ World Cup
set for Australia next year.
The achievement was noteworthy on several levels. To begin
with, qualifying for the World Cup in any sport is not something to thumb your
nose at. Secondly, this team was cash strapped to the point that in some
instances they did not have drinking water to slake their thirst during
matches. And finally they have done it without complaining, they have only
begged for a chance to show their stuff.
Casual observers of sport look back with nostalgia to the
glory days of sport in Uganda – The Idi Amin era. It is safe to say that the
achievements of our sports men and women in the 1970s have not been equalled
since.
This shouldn’t come as surprise in for a number of reasons
but more importantly that these group of athletes came of age in the 1970s
after a solid grounding in their formative years in the 1960s. In a sense the
success of the Amin era was built in the 1960s when things were more stable and
there was a vibrant grassroots network to recruit and develop their talent.
Ofcourse from the 1970s this foundation was decimated and
received little to no help in the subsequent decades and continues to benefit
little even today.
So how do you explain this seeming resurgence in our
national teams?
The She Cranes aside
our long distance athletes are making people seat up and take notice, our
boxers managed two medals in the recently concluded Commonwealth Games for the
first time since 2002.
Anyone who has ever attempted mastery of a sport knows it
takes time and perseverance. These will count for nothing if you do not have
the facilities. And facilities will count for nothing if the environment does
not allow you to use them effectively.
As a nation we have added little to the stock of sporting
facilities since the 1970s, apart maybe from Namboole Stadium. A white elephant. No athlete can point to the Chinese built
facility as the source of their success since it was opened in 1997.
"So it is kind of surprising that we should be celebrating any kind of sporting success at all. And it is not surprising therefore that the sports that are seemingly breaking out are sports, which require little or no equipment...
If anything we are losing our facilities to land grabbing
developers and general indifference.
In addition not only are our sports getting no funding to
speak of from government, their
respective managements have been unable to rally the kind of corporate support
that can not only ferry them from
tournament to tournament, but that can also sponsor a robust grassroot effort
that would guarantee a pipeline of talent into the future.
So it is kind of surprising that we should be celebrating
any kind of sporting success at all. And it is not surprising therefore that
the sports that are seemingly breaking out are sports, which require little or
no equipment.
But it also means that these successful athletes are
outliers of the outliers. Exceptionally talented individuals the type of which
come around once in a life time. In times of extreme stress it is only the
hardiest that come out the other side. So in this environment of extreme
deprivation it’s only the Kiprotichs and Kipsiros that will thrive.
These are not the circumstances from which generations of
world beating athletes are nurtured.
One can expect these athletes may trigger some enthusiasm
for their respective sports, but unless they keep stoking the fire year after
year by winning, the initial bursts of excitement will die out and be relegated
to the history books.
So what to do?
Forget about government to begin with.
Secondly our sports organisations need to move away from
voluntary associations to more professionally manned institutions. What comes
first, the money or the management?
It’s not a chicken and egg situation. Money follows good
management. In this case good management would show itself through structured
administrations, able to raise funds – through sponsors or events, to promote
and develop the sport.
My favourite example is the US, which while it does not have
a sports ministry is the greatest sporting nation in the world. The various
sports governing bodies, while they may be overseen by elected officials, the
day to day running is in the hands of professionals.
Of course governments can play a critical role in sports.
In continental Europe the central and local governments feel
obliged to finance community sports facilities and the development of sporting
talent. As a result their sports stars tend to be less elitist compared to
those that come out of the US. This system has worked in Germany, France and
Scandanavia.
These are all functioning governments which carry out their
other responsibilities like providing education and health services with a high
degree of efficiency.
Back to the She Cranes. They are an aberration. Given the
above description the probability of one world class athlete emerging is infinitely
small and the chance of a whole team of champions even slighter.
Enjoy the She Cranes while you can. They are that once in a
life time team you will tell your grandchildren about.
No comments:
Post a Comment