Last week Uganda electricity Generation Company Ltd (UEGCL) had it’s annual general meeting during which it was reported the company was firmly in the black for the third year in a row, a healthier situation from five years ago when they relied on government handouts to stay afloat.
UEGCL, which owns all of governments power generation
plants, saw their fortunes turn around when revenues from power sold at Isimba
dam started gushing through. We can expect too that when Karuma finally come
son line they will be on a irreversible trend to financial sustainability. Or not.
A cursory look over the company’s financials show that it
made a profit of sh92b in the year to June this year compared to sh2.8b in the
previous year. The quantum leap in profit – 3,100 percent, was due to foreign
exchange gains—sh71b on their foreign denominated debt. While this was a happy
situation, it was an unusual one as they often make exchange losses, with the last
profit was registered in 2019. Nevertheless, the profit from operations was a
healthy sh21b still almost a tenfold increase from the previous year.
UEGCL’s major revenue source was Isimba, which accounted for
sh139b or 82 percent of the total revenues of sh170b.
Also while total assets slipped to sh7trillion from
sh7.1trillion shareholder equity was up to sh833b from sh741b helped in no
small part by continued reduction of accumulated losses on the company’s books.
UEGCL has been profitable since 2019, three years in the 20 years of its
existence.
But the management will be forgiven for not fully breaking
out the champagne.
The company’s mandate does not stop at running government’s
power generation assets but extends to building and acquiring new assets. It
goes without saying this means the company needs money to do this.
"As it is now UEGCL cannot fulfill its full mandate because while it is provided for in their books government does not allow the depreciation and a Return on Equity (ROE). If they kept the depreciation on their plant and machinery, they would be better able to replace the existing infrastructure. As it is now to replace dams like Kiira and Nalubale UEGCL would have to run to government for funding which means UEGCL cannot stand on its own feet...
By allowing them some ROE the generator can then develop new
assets either on their own or in partnership with other players.
The financial self-sufficiency of UEGCL is important because
to begin with they are already behind schedule in meeting the country’s power
generation needs. The National Development Plan II (NDPII) envisaged that we
would have power generation capacity of 2500MW by 2020. There is a current
installed capacity of 1,252 MW. While this is more than enough for now – peak demand
is about 750 MW, going by current growth in demand and if we maintain the
status quo we will be back to load shedding by 2027. While this may seem a
while away, Uganda’s recent experience shows that it takes seven to ten years
to develop a power generation project, so the time to start planning for new
capacity was yesterday.
Government too can help improve UEGCL’s financial position
by carrying the exchange risk on the foreign loans it contracts. While this
year was good for UEGCL with some exchange gain registered more often than not
in recent memory there have been more exchange losses than gains. This is
important because UEGCL bills in shillings, if they were charging us in dollars
for power this would not be an issue.
If they did just these things – allow UEGCL keep the
depreciation, allow too for ROE and shield them from the exchange risk of
repaying the loans, the company’s financials will improve markedly and allow
them to go to market on their own to finance developments.
"It is not unusual. Across the border UEGCL’s Kenyan counterpart Kengen are not only wildly profitable -- $148m (sh533b) but have developed generation assets worth $2.2b (sh8trillion) over the last 10 years...
The government is currently borrowing on behalf of the
sector, because they can get cheaper money as the industry companies have
wanting balance sheets, companies will UEGCL which can then collect the the money
from tariffs and send to government which then pays the creditors. The mere
friction of passing through many hands rather from operator straight to
creditor presupposes inefficiency, which we pay for in the tariff.
Maybe one last thing would be to convert the debt we have
incurred on projects like Isimba and Karuma into equity, essentially government
takes them over as a way to further boost the company balance sheet.
For a long time we had challenges with developing our
generation capacity, hence our prolonged load shedding a decade or so ago.
Drastic action by government has brought us to the happy place we are now, with
surplus generation capacity. While transmission and distribution companies need
help as well, UEGCL anchors the sector, now power generated no power to
transmit or distribute.
To prevent future pain let government take the needed action
to make sure UEGCL is sustainable well into the future.
