Last week Chinese E-commerce site Alibaba sold its shares on
the New York Stock Exchange raising more than $20b or equivalent of the size of
the Ugandan economy, in a sign of things to come.
In the same week I sat in a meeting where the point was made
that, how is it possible that National
Social Security Fund (NSSF), with its
sh4 trillion war chest is investing abroad when local businessmen are crying
for a source of cheap capital.
On the one hand the Chinese businessmen in moves to get
wider international acceptance are selling their shares abroad, while here our
biggest financial institution is investing abroad.
For Jack Ma – the founder of Alibaba, which in market
capitalisation is bigger than more established e-commerce sites Amazon and ebay
combined, to be able to sell his shares in US he had to organise his company to
be acceptable to investors there.
Could he have raised the $20b in China? Most probably. But
with wider international acceptance he can tap into a bigger pool of finance,
human resource and innovation. Remember that name, Jack Ma, because with the
Chinese market tied down, expect him and his company to be jostling for space
on the front covers of the leading business publications for years to come. He
is 50.
NSSF argues that it has to invest abroad because they are
few investment opportunities at home. Before you drop your mouth and slap your
head at the apparent absurdity of this claim lets examine look at it again.
Using a rough calculation if NSSF paid its savers last year
11% on their money, they need to make more than that in profit on their
sh4.2trillion hoard. They would need investments that would give them double
digit returns on their money at least.
"NSSF is not a charitable organisation and as a saving member I would expect them to be very exacting in how they choose their investments and partners...
Imagine if NSSF stood on their street corner and announced
they had a trillion shillings to lend out or invest and can people present
their proposals. Say they just want to deal with just 100 investors so they
would be willing to invest at least sh10b or $4m with each investor. Whereas
the line may stretch around the corner onto Kampala road, the short list of
promoters may not fill the Fund’s reception area.
This is why?
NSSF’s mind set is(or should be) locked on the Return on Investment
or how quickly will it get its initial capital back. In making this judgement
he will evaluate the quality of the management, the potential for growth in the
company’s market, the competitiveness of the applying company in that market
and whether they are getting the investment at a fair value.
These parameters are important in determining what to invest
in, especially since NSSF is dealing with people’s pensions or retirement
funds. It is unlikely and shouldn’t be, looking for the riskiest propositions,
no matter how high a return they promise. So straight off NSSF is not going to
be lending to startups it will be looking for solid, established companies that
can absorb sh10b and show a return in relatively short order.
In our example, to be of interest to NSSF a company needs to
be able to absorb a sh10b injection. With that you knock off 95 percent of our
companies.
But even for those remaining five percent they may still
have a few more hurdles to jump.
NSSF is not a bank so does not lend to the general public.
So interested parties would have to sell shares to the Fund or issue a bond, a
form of borrowing. To do either they would have to get their books in order and
their books and processes audited by a reputable firm.
In saying there are few projects to invest in what NSSF is
saying is, it has looked and not found enough businesses in Uganda that are
willing or can jump through all those hoops to interest them.
Whose fault is that?
Back To Jack Ma and his Alibaba. By listing in New York,
Ma’s message to the world is that my company meets the highest known standards
of business practice. He has entered an exclusive club of businessmen and
businesses that can tap resources from around the world. He did this because he
wants to play on a wider stage than China and that is the cost of entry.
NSSF is not a charitable organisation and as a saving member
I would expect them to be very exacting in how they choose their investments
and partners.
You are a Ugandan businessman, thank you very much. But you
need more than proof of citizenship to make you interesting. If you do not live
up to best business practice I really don’t want to see my money thrown down
your black hole.
Get your house in order. Show some ambition, at least grow
out of Kampala for God’s sake. Then you can begin to lay claim to NSSF’s
billions.
No comments:
Post a Comment