ON UGANDA CORRUPTION AND WHY IT IS DIFFICULT TO FIGHT

In recent weeks several public officials have come under a determined barrage of allegations on social media about their misuse of public funds.

President Yoweri Museveni’s pledge to move on corrupt individuals during the state of the nation address two weeks ago, that was quickly followed by the arrest of several MPs, has only served to stoke the flames.

Some people have argued that the word corruption is too polite and that people caught stealing public funds should be branded thieves so there is no ambivalence about what they have done. I would agree only that corruption goes beyond stealing public funds to include, misappropriation, intentionally causing financial loss, favouritism, nepotism and a host of other ills intended to unfairly advantage the corrupt official...

According to the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index 2023, Uganda was ranked 141^st out of 180 countries with a score of 26, where 100 means not corrupt and 0 means totally corrupt. We have never threatened to rise above the bottom quartile of the index since it was first published in 1995.

These were just numbers until we learnt that personal generators bought with tax payers money were being given precedence over the more urgently needed generators in up country referral hospitals. Even more galling was that the generators being procured for the senior government officials were surplus to requirements for even the hospitals.  

This column has argued that corruption apart from distorting the market, it concentrates resources in a few hands and widens inequalities.

The current case illustrates it properly. The three referral hospitals according to the health ministry serve 6.5 million people. Before we go into details of the costs of the senior officials' generators – three times more than market rates, this means that the two officials are consuming the equivalent of 6.5 million people’s resources.

So the public will be forgiven for not swallowing the perennial lament that government is short on cash.

There is a concept called opportunity cost, which means that when you use resources on one thing you have invariably denied another project the resources.

So if you spend half a billion shillings on ensuring a cushy existence for our senior officials you are denying more than six million people, lifesaving services. It would be interesting to find a place where this can make sense.

Even more scary to contemplate, is that this is only the tip of the iceberg, if we took a second glance at the accounts of parliament, where this largesse was being doled out, you will need to be of stronger constitution to keep your food down.

But it also suggests that there is complicity across government. How is it the Auditor General missed this? Where was the Inspector of Government? The Criminal Investigations Department? Parliament’s own internal auditor?

And it is not even over yet. There is widespread complicity by us, the rest of society. When we know that there is no way our father and mothers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters, can sustain their lifestyle on a public servants’ salary and yet we still give the pride of place at our weddings, funerals and even churches.

Society’s message being, the end – riches, justify the means.

Many years ago in a discussion among friends, someone made a huge sigh of relief because a recent audit had failed to discover that she had been abusing her fuel allocations. She put it down to her Christian background, “God protects his people.”

"That is how bad corruption has become, to the point that we can explain away our maleficence because we are God’s children...

And therein lies the challenge of fighting corruption in Uganda. More than the fear that fullscale assault on the evil may very well topple the state – because the thieves will not just lie down and die, they will fight tooth and nail to keep their loot, is that it is so baked into our DNA as to totally overturn our moral sensibilities.

Many years ago a minister had solicited a million dollar bribe to grant access to the president, when he was he was aprroached by the media to explain himself, he complained that they were unfair exposing him when there were bigger thieves in government.

So where does one start?

Some quick wins can be gained by carrying out a lifestyle audit of all officials signed up to the leadership code. Our corrupt officials have reached such levels of impunity that they enjoy their loot in full public view.

If government can survive that exercise, it can then go on two restructure and strengthen the law enforcement agencies concerned with white collar crime. The laws will have to looked over to especially what kind of people, from a moral standpoint are allowed to hold public office.

Let government survive those two first before we can talk about long term measures.

"Ideally we should get to the point where the disgust shown a public official mirrors that of a father who defiles his toddler daughter, then we will see progress...