Every September, the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) makes headlines with declarations of double-digit interest rates, record asset growth, and triumphant milestones. This year, the figure was 13.5 percent—its highest payout in almost a decade. At sh26 trillion in assets under management, the Fund has cemented its place as the single largest financial institution in Uganda.
Yet behind the numbers lies a quieter, more sobering story: the yawning disparity in member savings. It is a gap so wide that it tells us as much about the structure of Uganda’s labour market as it does about the Fund’s own progress.
The Tale Told by Account Balances
For every Ugandan who retires with a comfortable balance in the hundreds of millions, there are dozens who have saved barely a million shillings after decades of work. Many accounts have less than 1 million in savings—barely enough to cover a medical emergency, let alone sustain retirement. Meanwhile, a small minority of contributors—corporate executives, senior civil servants, managers in banks and telecoms—hold balances running into hundreds of millions.
To be fair, this includes figures of the thousands of workers entering the job market for the first time or very recently.
This is not simply about individual discipline. It reflects the brutal duality of Uganda’s labour market.
Here’s a visual illustration of the savings disparity among NSSF members (using indicative, not official, data).
-
Left bars (blue): percentage of members in each savings category.
-
Right bars (orange): percentage of total savings held by those members.
It shows the classic skew: while most members have balances below sh5m, the bulk of savings is concentrated among a small minority with over sh50m.
A Market of Two Faces
Take a boda rider in Masaka. He may have registered for NSSF at some point, perhaps while working briefly for a logistics company. But today, as a self-employed operator, no contributions flow into his account. After five years, his balance is still below a million shillings, stagnant and eroded by inflation.
Contrast this with a mid-level banker in Kampala. Every month, his employer remits 15 percent of his salary. Over twenty years, his account grows steadily. With interest compounding at 10–13 percent annually, his balance crosses the 100-million-shilling mark.
The savings disparity within NSSF, then, is a mirror of the larger economy—where a small minority enjoy the stability of formal contracts and regular salaries, while the vast majority hustle in informal or precarious work with no safety net.
Why the Voluntary Window Matters
In 2021, Parliament amended the NSSF Act to allow voluntary contributions. For the first time, Ugandans like market vendors, mechanics, freelance journalists can put money directly into the Fund. On paper, this was a revolution: an opportunity to democratise retirement savings, bridge inequality, and make NSSF relevant to the millions who operate outside formal contracts.
The numbers so far, are eye opening. By mid-2025, SmartLife, the voluntary savings window, had mobilised just 27 billion shillings from about 33,000 savers since the launch in November last year. A drop in the ocean compared to the size of Uganda’s informal workforce but a powerfuiul indicator of things to come as the product gains traction.
Why such low uptake? Part of it is awareness—many Ugandans simply don’t know they can save voluntarily. Part of it is mistrust—public institutions still carry the baggage of opacity and inefficiency. And part of it is cultural savings are often seen as communal (SACCOs, burial groups, clan associations) rather than individual.
Aggressive Marketing is Needed
If NSSF is to close the savings gap, it cannot rely on legislation alone. It must market the voluntary window as aggressively as telecoms market airtime bundles. Picture adverts in taxi parks, campaigns on boda stages, roadshows in trading centres. Imagine a trusted voice in the community showing how a weekly contribution of just sh10,000 compounds into millions over a decade at double-digit interest.
The Fund should also tailor its products to the realities of informal workers. Flexible micro-savings, daily or weekly contributions through mobile money, and lock-in periods designed around school fees or harvest cycles could make voluntary savings more relatable.
This is not charity. It is strategy. If the Fund wants to hit its ambitious goal of covering 50 percent of Uganda’s working population by 2035, the frontier is not the corporates or ministries—it is the kiosks, farms, boda stages, and salons.
The Bigger Picture
The disparity in NSSF balances is more than a statistical curiosity; it is an economic risk. A society where only a minority retires with dignity while the majority slide into old-age poverty is one sitting on a time bomb. It increases dependency ratios, strains public health budgets, and erodes the promise of national savings as a driver of investment.
By mobilising the informal sector through voluntary contributions, NSSF can transform this risk into opportunity. Imagine if even half of Uganda’s 18 million workers contributed as little as sh10,000 a month. That would not only deepen the Fund’s asset base but also strengthen Uganda’s capital markets, reduce reliance on foreign capital, and enhance financial inclusion.
Conclusion: Bridging the Gap
The NSSF has come far, from a distrusted institution in the 1990s to a financial giant today. But its next frontier is not higher interest payouts or bigger real estate projects. It is closing the gap between the banker with 200 million on his account and the market vendor with 200,000.
That means making the voluntary window visible, accessible, and trusted. It means marketing savings not as an abstract retirement concept, but as a practical, life-enhancing tool.
The Fund’s slogan could well be: “If you can buy airtime daily, you can save daily.” Because until that gap closes, the NSSF story will remain incomplete—a tale of growth for the few, not security for the many.
