There was a line in this year’s Budget Speech that deserved far more attention than the usual debate about roads, oil, industrial parks and public spending.
Domestic revenue is projected to jump from Shs35.7 trillion this financial year to Shs45.6 trillion in FY2026/27, an increase of nearly 28 percent. Even more importantly, Uganda’s tax-to-GDP ratio will rise to 15.9 percent.
At first glance, it sounds like just another budget statistic.
It is not.
It may well be one of the most significant economic milestones in Uganda’s recent history.
For decades, Uganda has been building the foundations of economic growth. Since the late 1980s, the economy has expanded more than tenfold. Tax revenues have grown more than sixtyfold. Exports have diversified from coffee and a handful of commodities into gold, manufactured products, fish, cocoa and services. The country has liberalised its economy, tamed inflation and built critical infrastructure.
Yet despite all this progress, Uganda has often struggled with one persistent challenge: raising enough domestic resources to finance its ambitions.
The consequence has been dependence on borrowing and, historically, donor support.
That is why Finance Minister Henry Musasizi’s revelation that domestic revenues funded 80.9 percent of the discretionary budget this year is so important. Uganda is steadily moving towards financing its development from its own resources.
"The minister correctly described domestic revenue mobilisation not merely as a fiscal objective but as a sovereignty objective...
He is right.
A country that pays its own bills enjoys greater policy independence than one dependent on lenders and donors.
The generation that lived through the Structural Adjustment Programmes remembers that economic assistance often came with conditions. Many of those reforms proved beneficial, but the lesson remains the same: when someone else finances your priorities, they inevitably influence them.
When you finance your own development, you retain the freedom to chart your own course.
That is why the projected 28 percent jump in domestic revenue matters.
Yet perhaps the most politically significant measure in the entire budget was not the revenue target.
It was the decision to increase the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) threshold for the first time in more than three decades...
For years, Ugandan workers have quietly borne the burden of what economists call fiscal drag. Salaries increased, prices increased and inflation steadily eroded purchasing power, but the tax-free income threshold remained frozen in time.
Workers found themselves paying more tax even when their real incomes had barely improved.
The government has finally acknowledged that reality.
The increase in the PAYE threshold is long overdue.
It means workers will retain more of what they earn. It provides additional spending power for households grappling with school fees, rent, healthcare costs and transport expenses.
In practical terms, the change amounts to a salary increase.
A worker who was previously paying tax on the first Shs500,000 of monthly income will now retain an additional Shs30,000 every month because that portion of income is no longer taxed. Effectively, government has delivered a Shs30,000 monthly pay rise to many formally employed Ugandans without requiring employers to increase wages.
Over a year, that translates into Shs360,000.
The Treasury estimates that the measure will cost about Shs96 billion in foregone revenue. But that is a small price to pay for a reform that was overdue by more than three decades. In truth, the adjustment could—and arguably should—have been larger. Inflation has steadily eroded the value of the original threshold over the years. Had the tax-free band been adjusted periodically to reflect changes in the cost of living, today's threshold would likely be significantly higher.
Yet the symbolism matters. Government is effectively sharing some of the gains from stronger revenue performance with taxpayers. At a time when domestic revenues are projected to grow by nearly Shs10 trillion, foregoing Shs96 billion to provide relief to workers represents less than one percent of the additional revenue being raised. It is a modest concession, but a welcome one.
More importantly, it signals a welcome shift in thinking.
"The purpose of taxation is not to maximise taxes. The purpose is to maximise economic activity...
A growing economy ultimately generates more revenue than an overtaxed one.
That is one reason this budget deserves credit for focusing more on expanding the tax base than imposing new taxes.
The distinction is critical.
For too long, Uganda’s tax debate has focused on how much more government can collect from the same formal-sector taxpayers.
Yet the formal economy remains relatively small.
Millions of Ugandans remain outside the tax net, not because they are evading taxes, but because their economic activity remains informal, subsistence-based or too small to tax effectively.
The answer is not squeezing existing taxpayers harder.
The answer is monetisation.
That is precisely why the budget theme remains focused on commercial agriculture, industrialisation, expanding services, digital transformation and market access.
The logic is straightforward.
A subsistence farmer generates little taxable activity because little income enters the formal economy.
A commercial farmer purchasing inputs, accessing finance, processing produce and selling into organised markets creates taxable economic activity throughout the value chain.
The same applies to manufacturing, tourism, ICT, logistics and financial services.
This is where the budget’s emphasis on the ATMS sectors—agro-industrialisation, tourism, minerals and science, technology and innovation—becomes important. These are not merely spending priorities. They are future tax bases. They are the engines that will generate the jobs, incomes and enterprise growth necessary to sustain higher revenues without imposing higher tax rates.
The challenge now is to maintain momentum.
A tax-to-GDP ratio of 15.9 percent represents significant progress, but it remains below the levels achieved by many countries that successfully transitioned from low-income to middle-income status. Most sustain tax ratios above 20 percent.
Uganda still has ground to cover.
Fortunately, technology is making that journey easier.
The rapid growth of digital payments, e-invoicing, mobile money and integrated government databases offers opportunities to broaden compliance while reducing the cost of collection. The ideal tax system is one where paying taxes becomes seamless rather than adversarial.
There is another reason why stronger domestic revenue mobilisation matters today.
Uganda stands on the threshold of commercial oil production.
Many resource-rich countries have made the mistake of becoming dependent on oil revenues while neglecting their domestic tax systems.
The wiser approach is the one this budget appears to embrace: build a strong domestic revenue base first and treat oil revenues as an accelerator rather than a substitute.
Oil wells eventually run dry.
A productive economy driven by farmers, entrepreneurs, manufacturers, innovators and exporters can sustain prosperity indefinitely.
Ultimately, the most important story in this budget is not the size of expenditure, the roads being built or even the coming oil revenues.
It is a subtle but profound shift in philosophy.
For much of the last four decades, Uganda’s economic story was about stabilisation, liberalisation and growth.
The next chapter is about transformation.
Transformation requires resources.
Resources require production.
Production requires people participating fully in the money economy.
That is why the jump in domestic revenues and the increase in the PAYE threshold are two sides of the same coin.
One reflects a government becoming financially stronger.
The other reflects citizens being given a little more room to breathe.
A successful economy requires both.
As the new cabinet settles into office and implementation of the NRM manifesto begins, the real work starts now. As the budget itself notes, Uganda’s challenge is no longer merely growing the economy. The challenge is ensuring that growth translates into jobs, enterprise development, rising household incomes and prosperity for ordinary Ugandans.
If Uganda can continue expanding its revenue base while simultaneously improving the lives of its citizens, this year’s budget may be remembered not for how much government spent, but for how much closer the country came to paying for its own future.
No comments:
Post a Comment